Различия

Показаны различия между двумя версиями страницы.

--- bug_ref_fn [2025/12/15 11:27] – snegovick
+++ bug_ref_fn [2025/12/15 11:29] (текущий) – [Workaround] snegovick
@@ Строка 86: / Строка 86: @@
 ====== Workaround ======
-Объявление функции в блоке "модуль" помогает решить проблему:
+Добавление проблемной функции в объявление модуля помогает решить проблему:
-Добавляем empty в декларацию модуля:
 <code>
@@ Строка 98: / Строка 96: @@
 </code>
-Lets check libinterp/link.c. The error manifests itself in linkm proc (thats where "link typecheck" message comes from), for some reason <code>empty</code> is in <code>m->ext</code> array (interp.h / struct Module comment calls <code>m->ext</code>: "External dynamic links") and this loop:
+Lets check libinterp/link.c. The error manifests itself in linkm proc (thats where "link typecheck" message comes from), for some reason empty is in m->ext array (interp.h / struct Module comment calls m->ext: "External dynamic links") and this loop:
 [	for(l = m->ext; l->name; l++)](https://github.com/inferno-os/inferno-os/blob/d7b29f497205f48247d2bab33340bd7ace64de4d/libinterp/link.c#L41)
-iterates over <code>init<code/> and <code>empty</code>.
+iterates over init and empty.
-When you add <code>empty</code> to module definition explicitly, then this loop only makes single iteration with <code>init</code>.
+When you add empty to module definition explicitly, then this loop only makes single iteration with init.
 Limbo does not have anonymous functions (lambdas) as far as I know, so this issue just leads to inconvenience of declaration of functions you normally would prefer not to declare.